Dynamic Coronary Roadmap versus standard angiography for percutaneous coronary intervention: the randomised, multicentre DCR4Contrast trial.

BACKGROUND: Decreasing the amount of iodinated contrast is an important safety aspect of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with a high risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). Dynamic Coronary Roadmap (DCR) is a PCI navigation support tool projecting a motion-compensated virtual coronary roadmap overlay on fluoroscopy, potentially limiting the need for contrast during PCI. AIMS: This study investigates the contrast-sparing potential of DCR in PCI, compared to standard angiographic guidance. METHODS: The Dynamic Coronary Roadmap for Contrast Reduction (DCR4Contrast) trial is a multicentre, international, prospective, unblinded, stratified 1:1 randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to either DCR-guided PCI or to conventional angiography-guided PCI. The primary endpoint was the total volume of iodinated contrast administered, and the secondary endpoint was the number of cineangiography runs during PCI. RESULTS: The study population included 356 randomised patients (179 in DCR and 177 in control groups, respectively). There were no differences in patient demographics, angiographic characteristics or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between the two groups. The total contrast volume used during PCI was significantly lower with DCR guidance compared with conventional angiographic guidance (64.6±44.4 ml vs 90.8±55.4 ml, respectively; p<0.001). The total number of cineangiography runs was also significantly reduced in the DCR group (8.7±4.7 vs 11.7±7.6 in the control group; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional angiography-guided PCI, DCR guidance was associated with a significant reduction in both contrast volume and the number of cineangiography runs during PCI. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04085614).

Early and late onset cardiotoxicity following anthracycline-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: Incidence and predictors.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiotoxicity represents a major limitation for the use of anthracyclines or trastuzumab in breast cancer patients. Data on longitudinal studies about early and late onset cardiotoxicity in this group of patients is scarce. The objective of the present study was to assess predictors of early and late onset cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer treated with A. METHODS: 100 consecutive patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy (CHT) to treat breast cancer were included in this prospective study. All patients underwent evaluation at baseline, at the end of CHT, 3 months after the end of CHT and 1 and 4 years after the beginning of CHT. Clinical data, systolic and diastolic echo parameters and cardiac biomarkers including high sensitivity Troponin T (TnT), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and Heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) were assessed. RESULTS: Mean doxorubicin dose was 243 mg/m2. Mean follow-up was 51.8 ± 8.2 months. At one-year incidence of anthracycline related-cardiotoxicity (AR-CT) was 4% and at the end of follow-up was 18% (15 patients asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, 1 patients heart failure and 2 patients a sudden cardiac death). Forty-nine patients developed diastolic dysfunction (DD) during first year. In the univariate analysis DD during first year was the only parameter associated with AR-CT (Table 1). In the logistic regression model DD was independently related with the development of AR-CT, with an odds ratio value of 7.5 (95% CI 1.59-35.3). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of late-onset cardiotoxicity is high but mostly subclinical. Diastolic dysfunction early after chemotherapy is a strong predictor of anthracycline cardiotoxicity.

Rationale and design of the Dynamic Coronary Roadmap for Contrast Reduction (DCR4Contrast) in PCI randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The clinical and anatomic complexity of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has increased significantly over the past 2 decades. Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) significantly impacts prognosis after PCI, therefore minimizing the risk of CIN is important in improving clinical outcomes. Dynamic Coronary Roadmap (DCR) is a PCI navigation support tool which may decrease CIN by projecting a motion-compensated virtual coronary roadmap overlay on fluoroscopy, potentially reducing iodinated contrast volume during PCI. STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES: The Dynamic Coronary Roadmap for Contrast Reduction trial (DCR4Contrast) is a multi-center, prospective, unblinded, stratified 1:1 randomized controlled trial investigating if DCR use reduces the total contrast volume administered during PCI compared to PCI performed without DCR guidance. DCR4Contrast aims to recruit 394 patients undergoing PCI. The primary end point is the total undiluted iodinated contrast volume administered during the PCI, performed with or without DCR. As of November 14, 2022, 346 subjects have been enrolled. CONCLUSIONS: The DCR4Contrast study will investigate the potential contrast-sparing effect of the DCR navigation support tool in patients undergoing PCI. By reducing iodinated contrast administration, DCR has the potential to contribute to reduced risk of CIN and thus increase PCI safety. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04085614.

Comprehensive Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia Mechanisms in the Catheterization Laboratory: Design and Rationale of the Advanced Invasive Diagnosis Strategy for Patients with Stable Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Coronary ANGIOgraphy - the AID-ANGIO Study.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic yield of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) to identify obstructive coronary artery disease in the context of chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) is very low. Furthermore, myocardial ischemia may have a non-obstructive origin, which cannot be detected by ICA. METHODS: AID-ANGIO is an observational, prospective, single-cohort, multicenter study, intended to evaluate the diagnostic yield of adopting a hierarchical strategy to assess obstructive and non-obstructive causes of myocardial ischemia in an all-comers population of patients with CCS at the time of ICA. The primary endpoint will investigate the additional diagnostic value of such strategy over angiography alone regarding the identification of ischemia-generating mechanisms. SUMMARY: An estimated sample of consecutive 260 patients with CCS referred by their clinicians to ICA, will be enrolled. In a stepwise manner, a conventional ICA will be performed as the initial diagnostic tool. Those patients with severe-grade stenosis will not undergo further assessment and an obstructive origin for myocardial ischemia will be assumed. Subsequently, the remainder with intermediate-grade stenosis will be assessed with pressure guidewires. Those with a negative result from physiological evaluation and those without epicardial coronary stenosis will be further studied for ischemia of non-obstructive origin, including microvascular dysfunction and vasomotor disorders. The study will be conducted in two steps. Firstly, ICA images will be displayed to patient's referring clinicians, who will be asked to identify the existent epicardial stenosis, their angiographic severity and probable physiological relevance, together with a tentative therapeutic approach. Then, the diagnostic algorithm will continue to be applied and, considering the whole gathered information, a definite therapeutic plan will be consensually established by the interventional cardiologist and patient's referring clinicians. CONCLUSION: The AID-ANGIO study will assess the additional diagnostic yield of a hierarchical strategy over ICA alone to identify ischemia-generating mechanisms in patients with CCS and its impact on therapeutic approach. Positive results of the study might support a streamlined invasive diagnostic process for patients with CCS.

Treatment preferences as basis for decision making in patients using direct oral anticoagulants in Spain.

Treatment preferences are considered a relevant decision-making driver by the main atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines. Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs), considered as similar clinically, have administration differences useful for treatment individualization. Preferences, priorities and satisfaction of DOAC users were assessed through an observational, multicentric (25 hospitals), cross-sectional study including adult AF-patients (and/or caregivers) in Spain. Three study groups were considered according to DOAC posology preferences: (A) once-daily, with water; (B) once-daily, with food; (C) twice-daily. Overall, 332 patients and 55 caregivers were included. Mean (SD) age was 73.7 (10.7) years [58.7 (13.9) for caregivers]; 51.5% women [69.1% for caregivers]; 80.7% showed comorbidities and poly-pharmacy [6.6 (3.3) drugs/day]. No statistically significant differences were shown among study groups. Once-daily administration was preferred by 274 patients (82.5%) [60.8% (Group A); 21.7% (Group B); 17.5% (Group C)], and 47 caregivers (85.5%) [58.2% (Group A); 27.3% (Group B); 14.5% (Group C)]. Once-daily DOACs were prescribed in 42.8% of the patients. Bleeding risk was the main concern for both, patients and caregivers, followed by DOAC posology and interactions. Although treatment satisfaction (patients and caregivers) was high (9.0 and 9.1 points, respectively), match between individual treatment preferences and real prescriptions was only shown in 41.0% of AF-patients, evidencing a need for patient involvement on treatment decision-making. There is not a patient profile linked to treatment preferences, and clinical criteria must be the main driver for decision-making. However, for most AF-patients (elderly patients), aged, with comorbidity, poly-pharmacy and high cardiovascular risk, once-daily DOACs would be the preferred option.

Design and rationale of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effect of vitamin D on ventricular remodelling in patients with anterior myocardial infarction: the VITamin D in Acute Myocardial Infarction (VITDAMI) trial.

INTRODUCTION: Decreased plasma vitamin D (VD) levels are linked to cardiovascular damage. However, clinical trials have not demonstrated a benefit of VD supplements on left ventricular (LV) remodelling. Anterior ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the best human model to study the effect of treatments on LV remodelling. We present a proof-of-concept study that aims to investigate whether VD improves LV remodelling in patients with anterior STEMI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The VITamin D in Acute Myocardial Infarction (VITDAMI) trial is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 144 patients with anterior STEMI will be assigned to receive calcifediol 0.266 mg capsules (Hidroferol SGC)/15 days or placebo on a 2:1 basis during 12 months. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the effect of calcifediol on LV remodelling defined as an increase in LV end-diastolic volume ≥10% (MRI). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: change in LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, ejection fraction, LV mass, diastolic function, sphericity index and size of fibrotic area; endothelial function; plasma levels of aminoterminal fragment of B-type natriuretic peptide, galectin-3 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; levels of calcidiol (VD metabolite) and other components of mineral metabolism (fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), the soluble form of its receptor klotho, parathormone and phosphate). Differences in the effect of VD will be investigated according to the plasma levels of FGF-23 and klotho. Treatment safety and tolerability will be assessed. This is the first study to evaluate the effect of VD on cardiac remodelling in patients with STEMI. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the corresponding Institutional Review Board (IRB) and National Competent Authority (Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS)). It will be conducted in accordance with good clinical practice (International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use - Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP)) requirements, ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and national laws. The results will be submitted to indexed medical journals and national and international meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02548364; Pre-results.

Diastolic Dysfunction Following Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients: Incidence and Predictors.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiotoxicity represents a major limitation for the use of anthracyclines or trastuzumab in breast cancer patients. Data from longitudinal studies of diastolic dysfunction (DD) in this group of patients are scarce. The objective of the present study was to assess the incidence, evolution, and predictors of DD in patients with breast cancer treated with anthracyclines. METHODS: This analytical, observational cohort study comprised 100 consecutive patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy (CHT) for breast cancer. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, echocardiogram, and measurement of cardiac biomarkers at baseline, end of anthracycline-based CHT, and at 3 months and 9 months after anthracycline-based CHT was completed. Fifteen patients receiving trastuzumab were followed with two additional visits at 6 and 12 months after the last dose of anthracycline-based CHT. A multivariate analysis was performed to find variables related to the development of DD. Fifteen of the 100 patients had baseline DD and were excluded from this analysis. RESULTS: At the end of follow-up (median: 12 months, interquartile range: 11.1-12.8), 49 patients (57.6%) developed DD. DD was persistent in 36 (73%) but reversible in the remaining 13 patients (27%). Four patients developed cardiotoxicity (three patients had left ventricular systolic dysfunction and one suffered a sudden cardiac death). None of the patients with normal diastolic function developed systolic dysfunction during follow-up. In the logistic regression model, body mass index (BMI) and age were independently related to the development of DD, with the following odds ratio values: BMI: 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.36), and age: 1.12 (95% CI: 1.03-1.19). Neither cardiac biomarkers nor remaining clinical variables were predictors of DD. CONCLUSION: Development of diastolic dysfunction after treatment with anthracycline or anthracycline- plus trastuzumab chemotherapy is common. BMI and age were independently associated with DD following anthracycline chemotherapy.

¿Bivalirudina o heparina asociada a inhibidores de la glucoproteína IIb/IIIa en el síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del ST? / Bivalirudin or heparin plus glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa inhibitors for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome?

La bivalirudina, análogo sintético de la hirudina que se une reversiblemente a la trombina, pertenece al grupo de anticoagulantes que son inhibidores directos de la trombina con un efecto muy predecible. El objetivo de esta revisión es responder a la pregunta: ¿cuáles son la eficacia y la seguridad del tratamiento con bivalirudina en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del ST, en comparación con la combinación de heparina (no fraccionada o de bajo peso molecular) e inhibidores de la glucoproteína IIb/ IIIa? Ambas estrategias han sido comparadas en dos estudios (ACUITY y REPLACE-2), de diseño e interpretación difícil, y que han mostrado una eficacia en términos de prevención de eventos cardiacos similar y disminución de las complicaciones hemorrágicas en los grupos asignados a recibir tratamiento con bivalirudina. Se realiza un análisis crítico de las evidencias y de las limitaciones existentes, que pueden servir de base para implantar una u otra estrategia en los protocolos de manejo del síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del ST (AU)

Bivalirudin is a synthetic analog of hirudin that binds reversibly to thrombin. It belongs to a group of anticoagulants that act as direct thrombin inhibitors and whose effect is highly predictable. The aim of this review was to answer the question: How does the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients with nonST-elevation acute coronary syndrome compare with that of the combination of (unfractionated or lowmolecular-weight) heparin and a glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa inhibitor? The two treatment strategies have been compared in two studies (i.e. ACUITY and REPLACE-2), both of which had a complex design and were difficult to interpret. These studies demonstrated that the two treatment strategies had similar efficacy in terms of preventing cardiac events and that fewer hemorrhagic complications occurred in the groups assigned to bivalirudin. We carried out a thorough analysis of the data available and their limitations, the results of which can serve as a basis for implementing one or other strategy in treatment protocols for nonST-elevation acute coronary síndrome (AU)